Skip to main content

About your Search

20121101
20121130
STATION
CSPAN 2
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
CSPAN
Nov 20, 2012 1:00am EST
is taking pictures of some of zandt in cairo. -- some event in cairo. you knew it was and of effective look. -- an objective look. i do not know who is taking the pictures. they may be working for some small network because the network does not want to bring in its own cameraman. >> notice if you watch more than one newscast, notice the number of times you will see precisely the same video when it comes from overseas in large part because the networks do not have their own reporters, and they have brought it from the same source. . no. 2, what is wrong with having a local reporter covering the event? a local reporter speaks the language and knows the people. let's say the local reporter is reported from tehran and the local reporter knows if he or she makes a misstep, they are going to be arrested and thrown in jail. the american reporter may get thrown out of the country, but that is probably the worst that is going to happen. i find there is no willingness to believe objectivity in journalism is possible. i keep hearing there is no such thing as absolute objectivity, to which i say, when
CSPAN
Nov 16, 2012 10:30pm EST
states embassy in cairo and it is of against -- into a in benghazi.lt and been gauz then it went on. this assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and is currently information continues to be evaluated. that is clearly what happened. the investigation is ongoing. the united states government is working with libyan authorities to bring justice to those who brought death to united states citizens. it subsequently became available to anybody i guess to ask for talking points, which the ambassador did. as i understand the process, the cia prepares additional talking points, which then go through the various components of the intelligence community. those components see their sign off on them, discuss them, and i believe the intelligence community signed off on the talking points. >> [indiscernible] >> not to my knowledge. >> why was there all the security today to protect the general patraeus >> the general was eager and willing to give us his views on this and the experience. that is very much appreciated because of the situation. we did not want to mak
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2